Monty Called US Troops Cowards What Eisenhower Did When the Shocking Remark Reached Him

Monty Called US Troops Cowards What Eisenhower Did When the Shocking Remark Reached Him

VERSAILLES, France — The most dangerous crisis of the Western Alliance in World War II was not a German artillery barrage or a Panzer column, but a single press conference held in a Belgian drawing room, and the three-word ultimatum that nearly tore the Allied command apart in the frozen winter of 1945.

The confrontation reached its peak on the morning of January 10, when Supreme Allied Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower sat in his office at Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force with a draft cable in his desk drawer addressed to General George C. Marshall in Washington.

The message contained a demand that would have ended the career of one of the two most famous soldiers in the Western Alliance. The cable said, in essence, he goes or I go.

The crisis began three weeks earlier, on December 16, 1944, when roughly 1,600 German artillery pieces opened fire along an 80-mile front in the Ardennes forest. The barrage lasted 45 minutes, and behind it came three German armies totaling nearly 400,000 men, more than 1,400 tanks and assault guns, and orders from Adolf Hitler to drive to the Meuse River and reach the port of Antwerp within a week.

Standing in the path of this assault were four American divisions of Major General Troy Middleton’s Eighth Corps, spread thin across a sector that Allied intelligence had classified as quiet. The 106th Infantry Division holding the Schnee Eiffel Ridge absorbed the worst of it, with two of its three regiments surrounded by December 17 and surrendering on December 19. Roughly 7,000 American soldiers went into German captivity in a single action, the largest mass surrender of American troops in the European theater.

By the evening of December 18, the situation was worse than the maps at Allied headquarters could show. German Panzer columns were driving west through gaps no American unit had been able to close. That same day in Luxembourg City, General Omar Bradley, commanding the 12th Army Group, watched his front tear open along a seam he could no longer reach with a telephone call.

Eisenhower summoned his senior American commanders to Verdun on December 19, where he opened the meeting with a line that has been repeated ever since, saying the present situation was to be regarded as one of opportunity for the allies and not of disaster. Lieutenant General George S. Patton, whose Third Army was attacking east into the Saar region, would break off contact, wheel his forces 90 degrees to the north, and drive into the southern flank of the German penetration.

Patton replied he could have three divisions moving in 48 hours.

The Verdun conference solved only the southern half of the crisis. The German breakthrough had driven a wedge between Bradley’s headquarters and the two American armies fighting on the northern shoulder of the bulge. The First United States Army under Lieutenant General Courtney Hodges and the Ninth United States Army under Lieutenant General William Simpson could no longer be reached by Bradley through secure communications.

Eisenhower made the decision on December 21, telephoning Bradley to inform him that effective immediately, both armies were being placed under the operational command of Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery and his 21st Army Group.

Bradley reacted with rare and open anger, arguing the transfer was unnecessary and that giving American armies to a British commander would be read at home as an American failure. Eisenhower listened and told Bradley the decision was made. The field marshal was at Zonhoven in northeast Belgium.

The Americans on the north shoulder were in Belgium. Bradley was in Luxembourg. Distance had chosen.

Montgomery received the news the same afternoon and acted immediately. That evening and again the next morning, he drove to the headquarters of the First United States Army. The description most often quoted about that arrival came from American staff officers present, one of whom later wrote that Montgomery entered Hodges’s headquarters like Christ come to cleanse the temple.

He wore his familiar beret, was followed by British liaison officers with maps under their arms, asked pointed questions, and reorganized the American command’s briefing procedures within an hour.

The friction that Zonhoven would eventually ignite had been building for more than a year. In August 1944, Montgomery had commanded Allied ground forces during the closing of the Falaise pocket in Normandy, and American commanders believed he had moved too slowly, allowing tens of thousands of German soldiers to escape. Then came Operation Market Garden in September 1944, Montgomery’s single narrow thrust into the Netherlands using three airborne divisions that failed by September 25, with the British First Airborne Division destroyed as a fighting formation and the American 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions taking heavy casualties.

By late December, with the First and Ninth American armies under his temporary command, Montgomery began writing to Eisenhower again about the question that had never gone away in his own mind. He wanted a single ground commander for the entire Western Front, and he believed that commander should be himself. His letters became insistent.

His chief of staff, Major General Sir Francis de Guingand, warned him privately that he was pushing too hard on a Supreme Commander already stretched to his professional limit. Montgomery did not stop writing.

In the first days of January 1945, with the bulge now contained but not yet reduced, Montgomery decided he would hold a press conference to clarify the record of the northern shoulder battle. Field Marshal Sir Alan Brooke, the Chief of the Imperial General Staff and Montgomery’s most loyal defender in London, learned of the intention and objected, telling Montgomery that a press conference at that moment would be misread on the American side, that the sensitivities at Eisenhower’s headquarters were too raw, and that the correct response was silence. Montgomery listened, thanked him, and proceeded anyway.

On January 7, 1945, at 3:00 in the afternoon, Montgomery stepped in front of 40 war correspondents at his tactical headquarters in Zonhoven, wearing a paratrooper’s Denison smock and a beret with two cap badges. He had prepared his remarks carefully, believing he was strengthening the Anglo-American alliance at its most fragile moment. He began by reviewing the operational situation on the map, speaking for roughly 20 minutes on the military facts.

Then he moved to what he called his personal impressions of the battle.

Montgomery told the correspondents that as soon as he saw what was happening, he had taken certain steps himself. He described the German attack as one of the most interesting and tricky battles he had ever handled. He described his own actions in the first person throughout, using constructions such as I employed the whole available power of the British group of armies.

He referred to the American soldiers under his command as our gallant American friends and as jolly good chaps. He explained that he had begun tidying up the front once he assumed command.

Taken sentence by sentence, no single line was factually wrong. But the cumulative effect of the language on American ears was the opposite of what he intended. The narrative he built placed himself at the center of the northern shoulder defense as the organizing intelligence and placed the American armies under his command as the object of his organizing efforts.

The correspondents in the room recognized the impression forming even as he spoke.

The story that reached the largest audience in the first 24 hours was not the version any of the correspondents in the room had written. It was a version manufactured in Berlin. German military intelligence had monitored the accredited British and American radio broadcasts throughout the campaign, and within hours, Radio Arnhem, a German-operated black propaganda station, was transmitting a rewritten version of Montgomery’s remarks that stripped out every qualifier, exaggerated the first-person constructions, and cast the field marshal explicitly as the rescuer of collapsing American armies.

The Radio Arnhem signal reached American units in the field. Soldiers of the First and Ninth Armies who tuned across the European band heard what they believed to be Montgomery’s actual words. The information moved up the American chain of command within a day.

By January 8, Hodges had a written summary of the broadcast on his desk. By January 9, Simpson had the same summary. Neither commander could yet tell which version would dominate the American press, but both understood that in the units under their command, the German version was already circulating and being believed.

General Omar Bradley reached his own decision within 48 hours. At his headquarters in Luxembourg City on January 9, he convened his own press conference for the American correspondents attached to the 12th Army Group. He told them the Ardennes battle had been from beginning to end an American operation fought by American troops.

He recited the American divisions engaged, their commanders and their casualties. He named the units that had held Elsenborn Ridge, Saint Vith, and Bastogne. He stated for the record that the transfer of command had been a temporary arrangement made for reasons of communications only.

The Bradley press conference was carried on the front pages of American newspapers on January 10 and 11, framed by American editors as a direct reply to the Zonhoven remarks. Patton reacted more privately but with equal intensity, writing in his diary that Montgomery was seeking to use the Ardennes fighting to reopen his campaign for a single ground command, and that he would refuse to serve under Montgomery under any circumstances.

By the second week of January, the situation at Eisenhower’s Versailles headquarters had passed the point where routine diplomacy could contain it. On the evening of January 9, after the Bradley press conference had been transmitted and the Radio Arnhem broadcast had continued for two more days, Lieutenant General Walter Bedell Smith, Eisenhower’s chief of staff, brought the Supreme Commander a draft cable addressed to Marshall. The message presented Marshall with a choice: continued cooperation between 21st Army Group and the American Army Groups could not be guaranteed under present arrangements, and Marshall must choose between retaining Montgomery or retaining Eisenhower as Supreme Commander.

Eisenhower read the draft twice. He did not sign it that evening. He told Smith he wanted the text in his desk overnight and would give his decision in the morning.

Smith left the office and immediately did what his position required. He telephoned the one man in the British command who had the standing, the personal relationship, and the political skill to prevent the cable from being sent. He telephoned de Guingand, told him what was on the Supreme Commander’s desk, and told him that if he wanted to save his field marshal, he had about 12 hours to do it.

De Guingand was ill, running a fever for several days and ordered to bed by his own medical officer. He rose, dressed, and ordered an aircraft. Weather over northern France was marginal for flying, and his pilot advised against the trip.

De Guingand overruled him. His aircraft landed at Versailles by mid-morning on January 10. He went directly to Eisenhower’s office, where he told the Supreme Commander that if the cable was sent, the American case in Washington was strong enough that Montgomery would be removed, and that if Montgomery was removed at this moment in the war, the political consequences in London would be severe.

De Guingand asked Eisenhower for 24 hours. He said he would fly to Zonhoven that afternoon, put the situation in front of Montgomery in the plainest possible terms, and secure a written apology in Montgomery’s own hand that Eisenhower could accept and file. Eisenhower agreed, giving de Guingand until the morning of January 11.

He instructed Smith to hold the cable in the desk and to prepare a covering note for Marshall that could be substituted if a satisfactory letter arrived.

De Guingand flew directly to Zonhoven and arrived in the early afternoon. He sat down opposite Montgomery, closed the door, and told him without preamble that Eisenhower had drafted a cable to Marshall demanding a choice between them. He told Montgomery the cable would go the next morning unless a letter over Montgomery’s signature reached Versailles first.

Montgomery, according to de Guingand, was silent for a long moment. Then he asked the question that has been quoted in every subsequent account of the incident. Freddy, he said, what should I do?

De Guingand had already written the letter in draft. He produced it from his tunic and placed it in front of Montgomery. Montgomery read it once, made no changes, and signed it.

The letter was flown back to Versailles that night. Eisenhower received it on the morning of January 11, 1945. The cable to Marshall was never sent.

The letter was short, addressed to Dear Ike in Montgomery’s own hand on 21st Army Group letterhead. Montgomery wrote that he had learned his press conference of January 7 had caused distress and misunderstanding at Supreme Headquarters and among his American colleagues, that this had never been his intention, and he asked Eisenhower to tear up the letter he had sent and to consider the matter closed. He signed it very sincerely, Monty.

Eisenhower read the letter in his office with Bedell Smith present. He removed the draft cable to Marshall from his desk drawer, walked to the fireplace at the side of the room, and burned it. He then instructed Smith to prepare a brief reply thanking the field marshal for his letter and confirming that the incident was closed on the American side.

That was the end of the matter inside the private channels of the two headquarters. It was not the end of the damage outside them. The Radio Arnhem broadcasts had continued through January 8 and 9, and versions of the German account had been picked up by neutral press services in Sweden, Switzerland, and Portugal, and republished throughout the second week of January.

By January 12, the American press was carrying its own commentary on both the Bradley response and the underlying Zonhoven remarks, and the story had taken on a momentum that no private letter could arrest.

The corrective came on January 18, 1945, from an unexpected source. Winston Churchill rose in the House of Commons that afternoon to deliver a statement on the military situation. His speech ran nearly 90 minutes, but the passage that ended the crisis occupied roughly 5 minutes near the middle.

Churchill told the House that United States troops had done almost all the fighting and had suffered almost all the losses both in men and in the reputation of arms. He said that only one American had been killed for every 60 or 70 Germans, and he described the ratio of American to British forces engaged as approximately 30 to 1.

Churchill then delivered the sentence that mattered most. He said that this was undoubtedly the greatest American battle of the war and would, he believed, be regarded as an ever famous American victory. The speech was carried in full by the BBC and reprinted in the American press within 24 hours.

Its effect on American opinion was immediate. The New York Times editorial of January 19 accepted the Churchill formulation without qualification.

The consequences for Montgomery inside the alliance were quiet, deliberate, and permanent. Eisenhower did not remove him. He did what a Supreme Commander who has decided a subordinate will remain in place but will never again be trusted with the same latitude does.

He restructured. On January 17, 1945, Eisenhower issued orders returning the First United States Army to Bradley’s 12th Army Group with effect from midnight on January 17 to 18. The Ninth United States Army remained under 21st Army Group for the coming Rhineland operations, but its status was now understood as a specific and time-limited attachment.

When Eisenhower designed the final phase of the western campaign in the spring of 1945, the main effort was assigned to Bradley’s 12th Army Group along the central axis toward Leipzig and the Elbe. Montgomery’s 21st Army Group in the north was directed toward the Baltic port of Lubeck and the German plain. An important mission, but no longer the decisive one.

The strategic priority Montgomery had spent the autumn and winter demanding for himself had been quietly transferred to the Americans. It was never returned.

The professional relationships never recovered. Bradley’s 1951 memoir, A Soldier’s Story, devoted extended passages to the Ardennes command dispute and to the Zonhoven press conference. Bradley wrote that he had come as close on those January days as at any point in the war to asking to be relieved rather than serve under further arrangements he considered dishonorable to American arms.

Patton’s diaries, published posthumously as The Patton Papers, contain a series of entries recording his conviction that Montgomery had permanently forfeited the professional respect of the American command.

De Guingand paid a price of his own. He had saved his field marshal at Versailles on January 10, but he had done so by acting on the authority of a friendship rather than an order, and Montgomery afterward held it against him in a way that his official correspondence never quite acknowledged. When Montgomery reorganized his headquarters at the end of the war, de Guingand was not offered the senior post his service warranted.

He retired earlier than his rank would have predicted in poor health.

The soldiers who had fought on the northern shoulder of the Bulge were never told any of it. They finished the winter fighting, crossed the Rhine in March 1945, and reached the Elbe in April. By the time the war in Europe ended on May 8, 1945, the argument at Zonhoven had faded from the front pages.

The internal SHAEF correspondence surrounding the January crisis remained classified for decades. The de Guingand mission of January 10 remained undocumented in the public record until Operation Victory was published two years later.

The Ardennes battle entered American memory as the last great German offensive of the war and as the fight that broke the German army’s power in the West. The January crisis inside the Allied command entered the archives where it stayed until historians began working through them in the 1970s and 1980s. Montgomery commanded 21st Army Group to the end of the war in Europe and accepted the German surrender at Luneburg Heath on May 4, 1945.

He remained a public figure in Britain for the rest of his life.

But inside the professional community that had run the western campaign, the record of what he had said at Zonhoven and of what had almost happened in the 11 days that followed was permanent. Eisenhower forgave the incident. He did not forget it.

When he wrote his memoirs three years after the war, he chose his language about the field marshal with the precision of a man who had decided long before that certain things would be handled by omission rather than by argument.

What Montgomery had said at Zonhoven and what had almost followed from it in the 11 days after was never placed on the public record by either commander. It did not need to be. The soldiers of the First and Ninth Armies had answered the question of who won the Ardennes without ever being told the question had been asked.